Kitting vs. Traditional Inventory Management: What’s Best for Your Production Process?

Selecting the right inventory management strategy is critical to balancing cost, efficiency, and reliability. Here is a detailed comparison of the traditional component-level inventory management approach versus vendor managed part kitting, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of each:

Traditional Component-Level Inventory Management

In this approach, your organization owns and controls the inventory of individual parts. You manage purchasing, storage, picking, and staging for production.

Benefits:

Drawbacks:

  1. Increased Complexity and Overhead
    • Managing thousands of SKUs requires substantial administrative resources and warehouse space to maintain and organize component parts.
    • Higher risk of picking errors and line shortages.
  2. Longer Lead Times to Production
    • Components need to be picked, staged, and potentially kitted internally, consuming labor and additional material handling time.
  3. Higher Inventory Holding Costs
    • Risk of excess and obsolete stock if demand changes or forecasts are inaccurate.

Vendor Managed Part Kitting

In this model, the supplier manages the inventory and delivers pre-packaged kits containing all components required for a specific assembly or work order.

Benefits:

  1. Streamlined Production Flow
  2. Reduced Tier Supplier and Inventory Burden
    • Opportunity for supplier consolidation, reducing time spent managing and expediting parts from numerous suppliers. 
    • Vendor holds and manages part inventory, freeing up internal space and capital.
  3. Fewer Internal Transactions
    • Instead of managing dozens of part receipts, you receive a single kit—simplifying logistics and invoicing.
  4. Improved Supplier Collaboration
    • Suppliers gain better visibility into your consumption rates and can plan production more effectively.

Drawbacks:

  1. Less Inventory Control
    • Relinquishing visibility and control can lead to risk if the vendor experiences delays or shortages.
  2. Dependency on Vendor Reliability
    • Any quality or delivery issue in a kit affects the entire build; if one part is wrong, the whole kit is compromised.
  3. Limited Flexibility for Changes
    • Engineering changes or last-minute adjustments can be harder to manage with pre-kitted parts.

Choosing the Right Approach: Strategic Considerations

FactorTraditional Component ManagementVendor Managed Kitting
High-mix, low-volume production✅ Better suited❌ May be inefficient
Stable demand and repeat builds❌ Can be burdensome✅ Ideal for kitting
Internal warehouse constraints❌ Storage intensive✅ Reduces space needs
Desire to reduce transaction load❌ High-touch process✅ Streamlined
Quality control preferences✅ In-house inspection❌ Relies on supplier QA

Optimizing Build Strategies with a Hybrid Model

The traditional component-level approach provides control and flexibility, particularly important in complex or highly engineered environments. However, it can be resource-intensive. In contrast, vendor managed part kitting supports leaner, more efficient production flows, and likely a lower total cost, but requires strong supplier performance and collaboration.

For many manufacturers, the best choice may involve a hybrid model, using kits for stable, high-run assemblies and retaining component control for customized or low-volume builds.

World Class Industries: Your Partner for Comprehensive Assembly and Kitting Solutions

World Class Industries (WCI) offers integrated procurement, assembly, and kitting services across a strategic and global supply chain for each of our customers. Visit our website to learn more about what we can do for you!